About the REZ network infrastructure project

When was the REZ declared?

The New England REZ was formally declared by the Minister for Energy under section 19(1) of the Electricity Infrastructure Investment Act 2020 (the Act) and published in the NSW Gazette on 17 December 2021. View the Renewable Energy Zone (New England) Declaration Order here.

The declaration was the first step in formalising the REZ under the Act and establishes EnergyCo as the Infrastructure Planner responsible for coordinating its development. It also set out the intended network capacity (size), geographical area (location) and infrastructure that will make up the REZ, and enables and sets the scope of key legislative functions under the Act, including access schemes and REZ network solutions (referred to in the Act as 'REZ network infrastructure projects'). As Infrastructure Planner, EnergyCo will make decisions such as assessing and recommending REZ network infrastructure projects.

The declaration followed an assessment of feedback received during the draft declaration exhibition period from 15 October to 12 November 2021. Minor adjustments to the geographical area were made which took both community and proponent feedback into account. These amendments improved the delineation between areas captured within the REZ subject to potential future development, and adjacent areas of National Park and World Heritage significance.

A stylised map of the specified geographical area of the REZ is included for reference and accessibility purposes only here. This stylised map does not form part of the declaration. The stylised map includes the existing 132 kV and 330 kV transmission infrastructure near and in the REZ as a geographical reference. You can download the GIS file of the New England REZ geographical area boundary here.

Note: The Minister in future may amend the declaration to expand the specified geographical area of the REZ, increase the intended network capacity, specify additional generation, storage and network infrastructure, provide further details and specifications, or correct a minor error.

What were the main factors considered in the planning and identifying the REZ?

A range of factors were considered in planning and identification of the five REZs, including:

  • potential land uses impacts, including on agricultural land,
  • environmental and social values, such as unique and sensitive biodiversity and cultural values,
  • population and housing density,
  • the location and availability of high-quality wind and solar resources, and
  • distance to existing high voltage transmission lines.
How much energy will the REZ generate?

The New England REZ has an intended network capacity of up to 8 gigawatts, aligning with the Australian Energy Market Operator’s (AEMO's) 2020 Integrated System Plan (ISP).

We received 80 registrations of interest for the New England REZ, representing 34 gigawatts of new energy generation and storage projects, during 2021. This interest significantly exceeds the amount of energy required to deliver the REZ. It will therefore help to ensure a competitive tender process and drive improved outcomes for the community.

For more information, visit Renewable energy generation projects.

Will EnergyCo operate the REZ transmission network?

EnergyCo is the Infrastructure Planner for the New England REZ and is responsible for the planning and development of transmission infrastructure required for the REZ. This includes all aspects of the environmental planning and approvals process, as well as the acquisition of any private land and easements needed for the project.

The delivery and operation of the network will be managed by the appointed Network Operator. EnergyCo will lead a competitive process to appoint the Network Operator which will design, build, finance, operate and maintain the new transmission infrastructure in the REZ. The successful Network Operator will then work with EnergyCo on the rollout of the project.

What does the planning approval process include?

Given the substantial complexities involved in transmission infrastructure planning, there are specific national, state, and regional planning processes enacted that guide, revise and modify projects towards a final design.

Typically, such projects move from a ‘preliminary’ study corridor to a ‘revised’ corridor, and then to a ‘reference design’ corridor which forms the basis of an environmental impact statement (EIS) that is lodged with the relevant approving authority.

EnergyCo will be the proponent of the EIS for the REZ network infrastructure.

The EIS is expected to be displayed for public exhibition in the second half of 2026. All submissions received as part of the exhibition will be reviewed, and a response will be made publicly available in a Submissions Report.

While the planning approval processes and construction of the generation projects will be the responsibility of the developers, EnergyCo will have a critical role in coordination to ensure the impacts and opportunities for the community are considered as a whole.

Transmission infrastructure

What transmission infrastructure is needed for the REZ?

The planning of the REZ Network Infrastructure is currently in the preliminary assessment phase, incorporating the conduct of studies and option analysis considerations. At a high level, the scope of the New England REZ infrastructure includes:

  • new transmission lines connecting Bayswater Power Station near Muswellbrook to the REZ (dual 500kV lines),
  • new energy hubs,
  • new transmission lines within the REZ, and
  • connection to new generation projects.
What are energy hubs?

Energy hubs are a modern type of substation that act as a connection point between renewable energy projects and the broader transmission network. Energy hubs collect electricity from solar, wind and storage projects and transfer it to the network so it can be distributed to the homes, businesses and essential services that need it. More information is available in our energy hub fact sheet.

What will the transmission towers look like?

High voltage transmission lines will transfer renewable energy from the New England REZ to electricity consumers, with the ‘backbone’ of the new network expected to be rated up to 500 kilovolts (kV).

The towers will be up to 70 metres high and are generally spaced 400 to 600 metres apart. The transmission lines have a minimum clearance of 7.5 metres off the ground to allow farming and other activities to take place safely underneath.

These transmission lines will be located within easements 70 to 80 metres wide and may be co-located within a single easement or be physically separated. Easements will be wider where transmission lines are co-located.

New England REZ - Image - Basic tower designs
Will there be impacts from electric and magnetic fields?

EnergyCo is committed to delivering a safe, reliable and efficient transmission network for the REZ. We understand there is concern in the community about potential health impacts from electric and magnetic fields (EMFs) when living and working near transmission lines.

EMFs are found everywhere, including in the natural environment, and are produced wherever electricity or electrical equipment is used. According to health authorities, including the World Health Organisation (WHO) and the Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (APRANSA), EMFs from electrical transmission lines are not considered a risk to human health.

A detailed assessment of EMFs from the REZ transmission project will be carried out as part of the project’s environmental impact statement (EIS).

This assessment will ensure EMFs from transmission infrastructure, including energy hubs and transmission lines, are within the required guidelines. For more information, you can view our EMF fact sheet.

Route selection process

How does the route selection process work?

Major infrastructure projects follow a comprehensive and structured development process with the level of detail and assessment increasing at each stage. The early stages are broad and strategic which help us decide where the project could go. Later stages become more detailed to refine the project’s location and decide exactly how it will be built.

We are following a typical route selection process for a project of this size including option assessment through to final design – each stage increasing investigations and validation.

We constantly refine the corridor along the way to balance technical, environmental, social, and economic factors and importantly, make sure we meet energisation targets.

Is community feedback being considered?

We welcome feedback from landowners and local communities on the preferred study corridor. We will continue to engage with potential hosts in or near the study corridor so their feedback can be considered in our planning process.

There will continue to be formal opportunities for the community to have their say via one-on-one meetings, online engagement, community drop-in sessions, community briefings, emails and phone calls. This feedback will be considered in the design and development of the project.

We understand that agricultural activities are essential to our State as well as the livelihood of communities in the New England region and will aim to minimise impacts to these activities wherever possible.

When will the transmission route be finalised?

The final transmission alignment, including a 250m-wide corridor, will be presented in the environmental impact statement which is planned to be displayed for public exhibition in the second half of 2026.

Why can’t existing transmission lines be upgraded as an alternative?

The existing 330kV transmission lines that currently transfer power between Bayswater, Tamworth and Armidale, and between Armidale, Kempsey and Newcastle, are operated by Transgrid. The lines are running at near full capacity and are not suitable for the large amounts of energy to be transferred for the New England REZ. Even if the REZ operated at a reduced capacity, these lines would be insufficient. 

Transgrid lines 83, 84 and 88 between Bayswater and Tamworth and 85 and 86 between Tamworth and Kentucky are 330kV single circuit lines. The New England REZ network infrastructure project needs to provide 6 GW of new network capacity through the first two stages, which requires four circuits at 500 kV voltage in addition to the existing lines. 

EnergyCo considered whether the existing lines could be upgraded to meet the capacity requirements for the REZ however this option was excluded early in the evaluation process due to a number of constraints: 

  • high construction impacts – the existing cannot be updated to meet the new capacity of the REZ. The existing lines would need to be taken down, easements widened and new infrastructure built.
  • lengthy power outages during construction – modification and construction around the existing lines would require extensive power outages. This would have a major impact on the operation of the National Energy Market (NEM) and would not be viable due to the number of outages required, along with the duration of the outages.  
  • high impact to regional centres – some townships along the existing transmission line route (including Tamworth) have experienced significant growth since the lines were first built more than 40 years ago. Co-locating transmission lines would mean widening the easement which would increase the number of impacted landholders and dwellings close to transmission lines.
Will the transmission corridor now follow the travelling stock reserve (TSR)?

EnergyCo assessed the TSR option in 2024 following requests from the community to increase the use of public land by locating the transmission lines within the TSR. Our assessment found locating the transmission lines within the TSR provided less favourable outcomes against multiple criteria, most notably impacts to private dwellings/landholders and high biodiversity value, and it was not progressed on this basis. The findings are available in our August 2024 report. 

The northern end of the revised corridor is in the vicinity of the Aberbaldie Niangala TSR (crossing it in 2 locations), however we are not seeking to locate the lines within the TSR itself. The TSR remains unsuitable for the lines, consistent with the findings of our 2024 assessment. The TSR assessment report identified that the area surrounding the TSR offers more favourable terrain, improved accessibility, and better bushfire management. The revised corridor takes advantages of these favourable conditions. 

The Bulk Corridor Design Refinement Report outlines how we considered the TSR in our assessment of the revised corridor.

Why can’t the transmission lines go underground?

EnergyCo is proposing overhead transmission lines for the New England REZ which provide the best overall solution when considering community, environment, economic and technical factors. 

The REZ has an intended network transfer capacity of 8 GW requiring twin 500kV double circuit transmission lines in an overhead configuration. Challenges associated with underground cables at this capacity include:

  • Construction: underground cables for high-voltage, long-distance transmission are significantly larger and heavier than overhead conductors and are more complex to install. They require large, deep trenches, resulting in substantially greater construction impacts.
  • Cooling and thermal management challenges: underground cables retain heat in surrounding soil, limiting natural dissipation and reducing operating capacity. Achieving the same capacity as overhead lines would require additional cables or active cooling systems, which would be costly, operationally complex and uneconomical over long distances.
  • Time and cost: construction would require extensive trenching and specialist installation methods to lay heavy cables without damage. Due to their large bend radii, underground cables cannot navigate terrain or avoid constraints as flexibly as overhead transmission lines.
  • Repairs and maintenance: underground cables require ongoing maintenance. Repairs require specialised skills, plant and equipment, often involving extensive excavation. Faults take significantly longer to locate and repair than overhead lines, which can prolong outages and disrupt energy supply.
  • Environment and land use impacts:  underground transmission is unsuitable in complex or sensitive areas such as rivers, cliffs and Aboriginal heritage sites, whereas overhead lines can more readily avoid or minimise impacts. Extensive trenching disturbs soil and biodiversity and can make the land unsuitable for farming activities. 

These challenges apply to undergrounding for the entire corridor or if only 
applied in localised contexts. 

What about underground high voltage direct current (HVDC) technology?

High voltage alternating current (HVAC) and high voltage direct current (HVDC) are different systems used for transmitting electricity. Globally, overhead lines are standard practice for 400-500kV HVAC transmission lines like those proposed for the New England REZ.

Typically, HVDC is suitable only for transferring bulk electricity point-to-point over very long distances. It is not suitable for networks that require new generation to be readily connected, like the New England REZ.

HVDC would require large and costly converter stations to convert power for connection into the existing NSW grid as it uses HVAC technology.

Using underground HVDC transmission for the New England REZ would pose significant challenges due to the long distances and would require more infrastructure to be built, which would greatly increase construction impacts, duration and costs.

This would include using large trenches, about 20m wide, over the full length of corridor which would need to be wider and deeper in areas with undulating terrain due to the need for cabling to have a minimum depth and limited bending. This means it is not a feasible solution for the project.

Refining the corridor to 1km-wide

How has landholder and community feedback informed the refinement process?

We have carefully explored a range of options to identify a transmission corridor for the New England REZ that best balances the needs of landholders, agricultural land uses, the environment and technical requirements of the project.

Community and stakeholder consultation has guided 8 key changes to our 250m wide corridor from October 2025 to April 2026. These include:

  • Bayswater Power Station: We adjusted the corridor to better suit the operational requirements of the landholder, AGL Macquarie.
  • Rouchel: We adjusted the corridor within the 3km study area to increase distances to nearby dwellings.
  • Gundy and Waverly: We moved the corridor as far east as practical (within environmental and topography constraints) to reduce impacts to equine businesses and increase distances to several dwellings.
  • Timor: We moved the corridor southeast (outside the 3km study area) to avoid Timor Caves and reduce impacts to species and habitat in this area, including bats.
  • Barry: We moved the corridor northwest (outside the 3km study area) to reduce impacts to threatened species and habitat. This change also increases distances to several dwellings.
  • Walcha: We moved the corridor to avoid proposed wind turbine locations and increase distances to dwellings.
  • Central Hub A (Kentucky): We moved the corridor to flatter terrain. This improved environmental outcomes by moving away from a local watercourse.
How many landholders are in the corridor?

By narrowing the corridor between Walcha and Muswellbrook to 1km wide, we have reduced the number of landholders affected from around 200 to 150 – removing around 50 landholders from the corridor.

The number of landholders impacted will reduce further as the corridor is narrowed to around 250m for the environmental impact statement (EIS) and then to a final easement of around 140m wide for dual lines, or 60-70m for single lines.

How have we minimised impacts to dwellings (homes)?

Our environmental impact statement (EIS) assessments are based on a narrower corridor of around 250m-wide located within the broader 1km corridor.

We are sharing this proposed 250m wide EIS corridor with landholders now to give a clearer picture of potential transmission line impacts and inform further discussions with EnergyCo. The 1km-wide corridor, and the narrower EIS corridor, are available to view on our interactive map.

How have we minimised environmental impacts? When will the extent of environmental impacts be confirmed?

The refined corridor avoids sensitive environmental areas at Timor Caves and near Barry.

We are completing a detailed assessment of environmental impacts from the project. This work is ongoing and will be included in the environmental impact statement (EIS) which will go on public exhibition in the second half of 2026.

We recognise some landholders have set aside land specifically for flora and fauna conservation. We would like to work with landholders to help preserve these areas, where possible.

Will aerial water-scooping operations be affected at Lake Glenbawn?

We do not expect the transmission lines to prevent aerial water-scooping aircraft from using Lake Glenbawn.

In developing the corridor, we have modelled a range of take-off trajectories, using real flight data, aircraft specifications, conservative climb rates, assumed low water levels and conservative clearances over the transmission lines. We have also reviewed information provided by the community. This work supports the corridor in its current location, however this will be verified through the EIS which will include a detailed assessment of aviation and bushfire risks. The EIS will be informed by ongoing consultation with NSW Rural Fire Service and firefighting stakeholders.

Lake Glenbawn is a large water body – around 1.5 times the volume of Sydney Harbour – and its water levels fluctuate significantly. Capacity of the lake varied from around 40-55 per cent from 2019 to 2021, increasing to 90-100 per cent from 2023 to 2025.

The transmission corridor traverses the eastern end of the lake in its shallow upper reaches. Based on our assessments to date, when capacity of the lake is low (around 70 percent or less), the area directly affected by the transmission corridor is likely unsuitable for water-scooping because of reduced depth and exposed hazards.

The lake was at around 100 per cent capacity when the upper eastern end was used for water-scooping operations for recent 2025 fires. In these conditions, the increased surface area, depth and inundation of hazards supported effective use of the easternmost part the lake.

The western area is generally safer and more reliable for aircraft in drier conditions due to the larger surface area and deeper water. The transmission corridor will not affect aerial operations in the western part of the lake, providing at least 6km of available flight path in both the east-west and north-south directions.

What are our next steps for working with landholders?

The corridor is not yet finalised or approved. We would like to keep talking with landholders to understand how we can further reduce impacts.

The proposed 250m-wide EIS corridor is being shared with landholders now, to give a clearer picture of potential transmission line impacts and inform further discussions with EnergyCo.

EnergyCo will acquire property interests, known as easements, to build and operate the REZ transmission lines. If we acquire an easement on your land, you will remain the owner and can continue using the land with some restrictions for public safety and reliability.

We expect to start acquisition discussions for transmission line easements later in the year, which involves issuing an opening letter and sketch plan outlining the proposed acquisition. We will keep landholders informed over the coming months as we get closer to issuing opening letters. Information about the acquisition process is available at energyco.nsw.gov.au/sbp-scheme

Are further changes possible?

Yes, we still have flexibility to make further changes. Even after acquisition starts, the process allows for ongoing adjustments to the alignment (i.e. micro-siting of tower locations) in consultation with landholders.

On the Central-West Orana REZ transmission project, more than 70 adjustments were made before formal acquisition started and a further 30 adjustments during acquisition. This is an important part of the negotiation process with landholders to help us achieve a mutually acceptable agreement for the acquisition.

How will landholder be compensated?

Landholders are entitled to two types of compensation if EnergyCo acquires an interest in their land for a transmission easement.

Compensation package under the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 (Just Terms Act)

This typically includes the market value of the property interests to be acquired, the reimbursement of reasonable valuation and legal fees, and other types of compensation that may be applicable depending on the acquisition and the relevant circumstances of the landholder. We will work with landholders to understand impacts the project may have on their productivity, business operations and on-farm assets as we plan the route and determine the compensation payable. Landholders hosting access tracks that are not impacted by the transmission lines will also be paid compensation.

Compensation under the Just Terms Act is paid in two stages. Under the two-step process, landowners receive the first payment before construction starts, with a final payment before the permanent easements are formalised. Further details are available at Valuation and compensation explained.

Strategic benefit payments

The Strategic Benefits Payments (SBP) Scheme was established by the NSW Government to recognise the role of landholders hosting transmission lines with a capacity of 330kV or greater. Under the scheme, landholders are paid the equivalent of $200,000 in 2022 dollars, per kilometre of eligible transmission line infrastructure hosted on their property. Payments are paid by the network operator in annual instalments over 20 years, adjusted annually for inflation using the Consumer Price Index.

Strategic benefit payments are in addition to the compensation package landholders are entitled to from EnergyCo for easement acquisition in accordance with the Just Terms Act.

Detailed information about the acquisition process is available on EnergyCo’s landholder support hub. We encourage landholders to speak with our team to understand more.

How can I raise a complaint or objection?

EnergyCo acknowledges and respects objections and concerns raised by local landholders.

We encourage landholders to continue sharing their views, including through the upcoming public exhibition of the EIS in the second half of 2026. As part of the EIS exhibition process, communities and stakeholders will be invited to provide formal submissions for the government to consider in progressing the project.

You can contact us if you would like to make a complaint. All complaints are reviewed through a formal process which you can view on EnergyCo's website at Complaints and feedback | EnergyCo.

The Energy & Water Ombudsman NSW (EWON) is a free, independent, dispute resolution body that investigates and resolves complaints about renewable energy transmission infrastructure in NSW renewable energy zones. You can contact EWON at any time for independent advice and assistance.

How can I get more information or support?

You can contact our team at any time to discuss the next steps for your property. You can phone us on 1800 061 114 (toll free) or email [email protected]. Our team is available to meet with you at your convenience. Support is available for landholders 24/7 and you can find details in our fact sheet.

Working with landowners

How will impacts to landowners be managed?

During the planning phase, we will work with landowners to understand farming and business operations and other possible property impacts or concerns. These in turn will inform the design scope of the infrastructure.

Examples could include avoiding structures and high value agricultural land, minimising fragmentation of blocks, limiting construction access, and respecting landscape.

During construction, EnergyCo will require workers to liaise closely with landowners in accordance with pre-agreed terms for access to properties. Workers will be expected to strictly adhere to rules protecting livestock, securing gates and biosecurity.

Will there be property and easement acquisition?

Easement acquisition is a common practice in Australia to allow for the construction and operation of transmission lines as well as various other utilities.

When acquiring an easement, EnergyCo will seek to enter into an agreement with the landowner which will set out all the rights and obligations for both parties in relation to the ongoing use and management of the land, including payment of compensation to the landowner for granting the easement, and any other required interests.

Property acquisition in NSW is governed by the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 (the Act). The Act provides the procedures a government agency must follow to acquire land from a landowner, as well as the principles for determining compensation.

You can read our property and easement acquisition fact sheet for further details on how EnergyCo will acquire easement rights for the REZ transmission project.

How do easements impact agricultural activities?

EnergyCo understands that agricultural activities are essential to our nation as well as the livelihood of communities in the New England region. We will therefore work closely with landowners as we design the REZ to understand current and future land uses and help minimise interference with agricultural activities.

While there are some restrictions within easements, farmers can still carry out regular activities like growing crops and grazing livestock. Once commissioned, transmission lines do not generally have a significant effect on farming operations. 

Further details are available in our fact sheet about living and working near transmission easements.

What is the Strategic Benefit Payments Scheme?

Under the Strategic Benefits Payment Scheme (SBP), private landowners hosting new high voltage transmission projects critical to the energy transformation and future of the electricity grid will be paid a set rate of $200,000 per kilometre of transmission hosted (in real 2022 dollars), paid out in annual instalments over 20 years.

Payments made under the SBP scheme will be in addition to any compensation paid under the Act to applicable private landowners for transmission easements on their land once the project is energised (ie operational).

How can I speak to the project team?

The EnergyCo New England REZ Project team welcomes your feedback at any time. You can:

  • Call us on 1800 061 114
  • Email us at [email protected]
  • Come along to any of the opportunities being held in REZ communities which will be widely advertised in advance.

Generation capacity

What is network or transfer capacity?

Also known as transfer capacity, or the maximum amount of energy can be exported from the REZ into the external network at any given time. 

Read more in our ‘how a renewable energy zone works’ and ‘coordinating generation and storage in the REZ’ fact sheets.

What is generation or hosting capacity?

This refers to how much solar, wind or battery can connect to the REZ network. It is typically higher than network capacity. 

What is headroom assessment?

An assessment to check whether there is more generation capacity for generators to connect to a REZ without overloading it. 

What are access rights and access fees?

Generation and storage projects that wish to connect to the New England REZ network infrastructure will need to secure an access right. Access right holders will be charged a yearly access fee that includes components to fund community benefit and employment programs. Access fees are set by the Consumer Trustee. Generators would start paying access fees once their projects start the commissioning process.

What is the process for declaring an access scheme?

EnergyCo intends to publish an Access Scheme consultation paper in Q2 2025.  This paper will outline the possible range or limit for generation capacity that could connect to the Access Rights Network. This paper will be published on EnergyCo’s website seeking responses from the public. A webinar will also be run during the consultation period.

Following the consultation process, EnergyCo will make a recommendation to the Minister to declare an Access Scheme which will include information on the processes for determining the maximum generation capacity that can connect to the Access Rights Network.  

Before making a final declaration, the Minister will publish a draft declaration (available on the EnergyCo’s website and the NSW Gazette) for at least 28 days to seek and consider submissions from the public (including representatives of NSW electricity consumers, local regional communities, and First Nations people) on the draft declaration. This is likely to occur in the first half of 2026.

There are public guidelines providing information on how the Minister will exercise the function of declaring access schemes under the Electricity Infrastructure Investment Act 2020, available here.

Finally, for more information, visit our generation and storage page.

What is the final network or transfer capacity of the REZ?

The REZ will deliver up to 6 GW of network capacity in the next decade by the mid-2030s with the opportunity for an additional 2 GW of capacity in the future.

Transporting energy equipment to the REZ

What is the Port to REZ Program?

EnergyCo is delivering the New England Renewable Energy Zone (REZ) network infrastructure project to provide a clean, affordable and reliable power supply for energy consumers across NSW.  

Delivery of the New England REZ involves: 

  • Building renewable energy projects, such as solar farms, wind farms and battery energy storage systems
  • Building transmission lines and energy hubs to connect these projects to electricity consumers. 

Both require significant volumes of oversize and over-mass (OSOM) equipment to be delivered to the Port of Newcastle and transported by road along designated routes to the New England REZ. 

The Port to REZ Program is essential for our transition to renewable energy. The Program will address the transport challenges of delivering OSOM renewable energy components, such as wind turbines, transformers, and other large pieces of electrical equipment, between the Port of Newcastle and key points within the New England REZ. Delivery of these components is essential to build renewable generation projects as well as the transmission infrastructure needed to connect them to the electricity network. 
 

Who is planning the route and are road upgrades needed?

EnergyCo is working with Transport for NSW to determine the most suitable, low-impact OSOM route to deliver energy components from the Port of Newcastle to the New England REZ. 

Upgrades to road intersections and pinch-points may be required to allow large components to be moved safely across the route to renewable energy projects.  

What are the benefits for road users?

Coordinating road upgrades to renewable energy zones will: 

  • Enable delivery of large components essential to construct and operate renewable energy projects in the REZ
  • Be carried out in a well-planned and holistic manner to optimise efficiency and coordination
  • Improve pinch points and intersections along the Port to REZ route 

Coordinating OSOM deliveries will: 

  • Reduce the impact on road users and communities
  • Improve safety 
What are oversize and overmass (OSOM) loads?

Building renewable energy projects and new transmission infrastructure require the movement of large components, which we refer to as oversize and over-mass. These tend to be: 

  • Very long – such as wind turbine blades, which we need to ensure can get through intersections, around corners, and past utility poles and buildings
  • Very tall – such as the base sections of wind turbine towers, which we need to ensure can get under bridges and overhead powerlines
  • Very heavy – such as transformers, which we need to ensure can safely traverse bridges and culverts.
What is the timing for OSOM vehicle movements?

Transportation of large renewable energy components will increase progressively along the route as construction begins in a REZ. 

Construction of major solar, wind and storage projects with planned connections to the New England REZ network infrastructure project will start once projects are approved.  

There are also several renewable energy projects that are planned to be delivered ahead of the New England REZ, meaning OSOM movements for those projects would start earlier. At this stage, we expect those to start in mid 2028. 

We are working closely with renewable energy project developers to coordinate the volume and frequency of OSOM vehicle movements during construction. We will keep the community updated as planning progresses and further details are finalised. 

How will OSOM deliveries be coordinated?

Coordinating the timing and frequency of OSOM deliveries is critical to minimising disruption for road users and communities. 

We are supporting Transport for NSW on an operational strategy which explains how this work will be coordinated and traffic impacts managed. This will consider local and regional road use. The strategy is being developed by Transport for NSW and will be shared with the community once the route is confirmed. 

Some strategies to minimise impacts on road users include building pullover bays, coordinating with schools and transport companies to understand local bus routes and delivering OSOM components at night where possible. 

How will safety be maintained?

Safety is an important consideration as we design the route. We are working closely with Transport for NSW and local councils to understand local road use and constraints in pinch point areas to minimise impacts on the road network. 

Some of the ways OSOM vehicle movement safety is managed includes: 

  • Scheduling OSOM vehicle movements to take place outside of peak traffic periods
  • Use of escort vehicles (driven by accredited escort drivers) or NSW Police to ensure deliveries are carried out safely, depending on size and mass of the load
  • Speed restrictions for OSOM vehicles
  • Pulling over to allow other vehicles to pass safely at intervals
  • Installing signage. 

OSOM vehicle permits are managed by Transport for NSW and the National Heavy Vehicle Regulator (NHVR). Transport for NSW and NHVR will notify communities and road users about OSOM vehicle movements along the Port to New England REZ route, including expected delivery volumes and times. 

Will the New England REZ route bypass local towns?

There are a number of towns along the road network between Muswellbrook and the New England REZ. EnergyCo and Transport for NSW are carrying out investigations to determine the most suitable, low-impact freight route to accommodate OSOM vehicles. 

EnergyCo has been working closely with local councils to understand local road use and constraints in key areas around town centres to inform OSOM route design options. The route design will consider options that minimise traffic impacts to Muswellbrook, Tamworth, Uralla, Walcha and Armidale. 

Will local roads also be upgraded?

Yes. Since early 2024, EnergyCo and Transport for NSW have been investigating the most suitable, low-impact OSOM route to unlock access from Muswellbrook to the New England REZ. 

The route will include sections of the New England Highway and Oxley Highway, as well as some local roads. 

Individual renewable energy project developers will plan and manage OSOM vehicle movements for their respective projects, including upgrading local roads and connections between the OSOM route and their project sites. The community will be invited to provide feedback as part of this process. 

Site investigations as part of the OSOM route planning will continue throughout 2025 and 2026. Subject to detailed design, planning and approvals, road upgrades are expected to start in 2026. 

Local communities and stakeholders will be notified ahead of work starting, including notification of expected work hours and temporary traffic changes, where applicable. We will make every effort to minimise impacts and disruption to landowners, local communities and motorists during this work. 

Will the OSOM route bypass Tamworth CBD?

Yes. The proposed Port to REZ route will bypass the Tamworth CBD to minimise disruption to businesses, pedestrians and local traffic.

The proposed alignment follows Whitehouse Lane, Marsden Park Road, O’Brien’s Lane and Nundle Road before reconnecting to the New England Highway near Nemingha.

The route has been selected following technical investigations, environmental studies and consultation with Tamworth Regional Council.

Why doesn’t the Tamworth OSOM route use Burgmanns Lane instead of Whitehouse Lane?

Burgmanns Lane was considered as part of the route assessment process.

EnergyCo understands Burgmanns Lane forms part of Tamworth Regional Council’s planned freight connection between South Tamworth and Nemingha. However, it was assessed as unsuitable for the Port to REZ OSOM route due to:

  • significant private property impacts
  • the need to construct a new road and bridge connection through the flood plain to Marsden Park Road
  • extensive environmental investigations and planning approvals
  • longer delivery timeframes compared to the Whitehouse Lane route.

The Whitehouse Lane route can be delivered sooner and with fewer impacts, ensuring OSOM deliveries to the New England REZ avoid Tamworth’s CBD.

Will the bridge over the Cockburn River at Nemingha need to be upgraded?

Investigations have been undertaken to assess whether the bridge over the Cockburn River at Nemingha can safely accommodate OSOM vehicle movements.

These assessments, along with property owner consultation and planning for the Nundle Road and New England Highway intersection, have informed the proposed route design.

If upgrades are required to support OSOM movements, they will be subject to detailed design, planning and approvals. The community will be notified ahead of any work commencing.

North hub relocation

What is an energy hub?

Energy hubs collect electricity from solar, wind and storage projects and transfers it to the network so it can be distributed to the homes, businesses and essential services that need it.

You can read more about energy hubs in our fact sheet here.

What makes a suitable hub location?

When we’re selecting a hub location, we need to make sure the land is the appropriate size and suitable topography for the proposed infrastructure. This includes avoiding flood prone land, minimising environmental impacts and avoiding infrastructure like farming structures and wind turbines. We also consider the broader power line alignment and where the lines will enter and exit the hub, to minimise impacts to nearby properties and proposed generation projects.

We are following a detailed planning process to develop the study corridor for the REZ project and the location of energy hubs. This includes considering a number of key principles, including minimising impacts to people and the environment, cost, technical design and making sure we’re meeting NSW energy targets. In addition to this, we’re carrying out ongoing engagement with landowners, stakeholders and the community to hear local feedback and refine the design.

Our key planning pillars include people, environment, economic, strategic and technical. You can read more about our planning pillars in our route selection fact sheet here.

What are the key benefits in relocating the north hub?

We are relocating the north hub as a result of extensive engagement with local landowners and the community to reduce impacts to private property.

The original location for the north hub was chosen because it co-located power lines on private property already hosting network infrastructure. The hub will now be located on land singularly owned by Origin Energy, providing fewer access constraints and reduces areas of environmental and heritage significance.

The new hub location has additional benefits for the design the project as a whole including locating more power lines and generator connections on land owned by renewable project developers.

Where was the north hub located and where is it moving to?

The north hub was originally proposed to be located on privately-owned land in the Dumaresq area, near Boorolong Road. The new hub location is about 5km west within the Origin-owned Warrane property. Warrane is about 18km north west of Armidale. 

Have your say and shape local initiatives

We have launched a survey aimed at understanding local issues and priorities for the region. Please take the time to complete our 10-minute survey and help shape the delivery of the New England REZ.

We’ve also released a series of studies that explore how the New England REZ can balance project impacts and benefits for local communities. The studies cover key topics including workforce accommodation, training and skills, local supply chain, waste and circular economy, and water and wastewater security.

Complete the survey and view the studies via our new online portal – your input will help shape future plans and ensure the REZ delivers real, lasting benefits for the region.

View the studies and complete the survey

Contact the New England REZ team

If you have any questions about the New England REZ or would like to provide feedback, please contact us at any time:

Call us

Tel: 1800 061 114 (toll free)

Email us